U.S. House - NJ-02 · New Jersey · 2026
General election · 2 on the November ballot · Incumbent running
Result
CalledFlip: R to DZack Mullock (D) won this race with 50.8% of the vote, 2.7 points ahead, defeating incumbent Jeff Van Drew.
- Zack MullockDemocraticWinner50.8%137,999 votes
- Jeff Van DrewRepublicanIncumbent48.1%130,631 votes
- Ramon Mora Jr.Independent1.0%2,836 votes
- Margin
- 7,368 votes (2.7 points)
- Called
- Called by Wikipedia editors, Nov 4, 5:14 AM ET (revision)
- Seat
- Changed party: held by Jeff Van Drew (R)
- Last updated
- Nov 10, 6:08 PM ET
Called it: miss Our locked call before polls closed was R; the winner is D. See every locked call
Unofficial until the state certifies the result.
Before the election
Polls, ratings and the Vugol Tensor below were published before votes were counted. They are not results.
Model rating Leans Republican (Tilting) on the Vugol Vector model, a snapshot of today, not a probability.
No polls on file for this race. Model inputs: 4 of 7, updated yesterday. Page updated 2026-11-15. Sources · What is validated
ExperimentalNews attention 43/100, how much coverage the race gets, not who is winning. Updated 4 days ago. How it works
On the November ballot (2)
From reported primary results, checked 2026-11-14. Each state certifies its own ballot; see the source below.
Ran in the primary (3)
Lost a primary or runoff for this seat, not on the November ballot.
Ballot source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_New_Jersey&oldid=1384916029
Latest verified field polling
Verified = published by the pollster that conducted it, with a public source we link to.
No verified poll has been published for this race. The Vugol Vector call from our model is below, it is not a poll.
Polling average
No polls on file for this race yet. See latest polls across every race.
Campaign money (FEC)
Candidate committee totals for the cycle from the Federal Election Commission (public domain), as of each committee's latest report.
| Candidate | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand | Through |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff van Drew | $2,414,607 | $2,282,246 | $894,792 | 2026-10-14 |
| Bayly Philip Christoper Winder | $825,207 | $824,182 | $1,025 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terri Reese | $16,994 | $15,219 | $82 | 2026-09-30 |
| Timothy C Alexander | $87,344 | $86,270 | $1,074 | 2026-06-30 |
| Zack Mullock | $960,948 | $855,548 | $105,400 | 2026-10-14 |
Ad spending (FEC)
What each campaign reported paying for ads, and what outside groups (super PACs, PACs and parties) reported spending for and against each candidate. Federal Election Commission filings, public domain.
| Candidate | Campaign's own ads | Outside groups for | Outside groups against |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeff van Drew | $2,800 | $486K | $1.5M |
| Zack Mullock | $0 | $438K | |
| Bayly Philip Christoper Winder | $273K | ||
| Timothy C Alexander | $11K | ||
| Terri Reese | $2,188 |
Biggest outside spenders
- Jeff van Drew. For: Project 218 $485K, NEW JERSEY RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE FEDERAL PAC $1,060. Against: Project 218 $1.3M, Invest in Tomorrow Coalition PAC $182K, American Represenative Majority $31K
- Zack Mullock. For: AB PAC $252K, THE TURNOUT PROJECT $100K, Voice of the Electorate (VOTE) $51K
Outside groups: 24- and 48-hour independent expenditure reports for the 2026 primary and general, through 2026-10-31, each expenditure counted once after amendments; "ads" is TV, radio, digital and other media, and the rest is mail, phones, canvassing and similar. Campaign's own ads: TV, radio, digital, other media and ad production in the campaign committee's itemized payments, as the campaign described them, from the reports the FEC has processed (latest through 2026-06-30); newer reports appear as the FEC processes them. These are amounts committees reported paying, not airtime tracked by ad-monitoring firms, so very recent buys and future reservations may not show yet. Parser fec-ad-spend-1.0.0.
Results
Vote counts as reported by the state; transcribed from the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), which cites the state’s official results.
general election
| Zack Mullock won | 137,999 | 50.8% |
| Jeff Van Drew (incumbent) | 130,631 | 48.1% |
| Ramon Mora Jr. | 2,836 | 1.0% |
Democratic primary
| Zack Mullock won | 17,698 | 39.8% |
| Tim Alexander | 12,168 | 27.4% |
| Bayly Winder | 9,846 | 22.2% |
| Terri Reese | 4,733 | 10.6% |
| Bill Finn | 0 | 0.0% |
Republican primary
| Jeff Van Drew (incumbent) won | 35,602 | 100.0% |
Source: Wikipedia article revision (CC BY-SA 4.0), retrieved 2026-11-10 · parser wiki-race-1.0.0+wiki-house-summary-1.0.0
Key dates
Official federal election dates for this state from the FEC. Registration deadlines and early voting: see the state election office.
- 2026-06-02, Primary election: U.S. House
- 2026-11-03, General election: U.S. House
Source: FEC election dates (public domain).
Primary and hypothetical polls (1)
Kept on file, never averaged into this race. Polls listed on the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), each linked to that article revision and, where we know it, to the pollster's own site.
- Hypothetical matchup · Public Policy Polling (partisan) · 2025-05-21–2025-05-22 · n=505 · Jeff Van Drew (R) 46%,Generic Democrat 36% · release
In the news
- Anti-Trump Republican courts other defectors as House weighs another vote against Iran war
- Here are some of the House seats that Democrats didn't expect to win this year
- Redistricting battle could spill into 2028
- How to make friends at freshman orientation
- All the Republican House members ousted from Congress
- Final rating changes: 63 races move toward Democrats, 1 toward Republicans
- House Democrats add eight seats to midterm target map month before election day
- At the Races: Seeing red in Minnesota?
- House Democrats grow more bullish about midterms as target list expands
Headlines from outlets across the political spectrum, linked to the publisher. Vugol.me doesn’t write or endorse them. How we choose them · All election news
LabVugol Vector & Vugol Attention
Vugol Attention 43 Vugol Vector R · Tilting
Vugol Me model signals, not polls. Verified polling is in the Polls section above.
Vugol Me Attention (attention intensity)
Vugol Attention intensity index 0–100 · not a poll · normalized nightly
Vugol Vector
Proprietary ensemble model · a call, not a probability · model confidence: medium
The breakdown of this call (the model's multi-signal input matrix, input by input) is on Ultra Pro plans.
Vugol Tensor
How far this call can miss · a range, not a prediction · no verified poll here, so the range is wider and untested
Centre R+5.2. Four times in five the result lands between D+4.2 and R+14.6; nine in ten between D+6.9 and R+17.3. Chance the Democrat finishes ahead: 24%.
Polls have missed by about four points in a typical race and they miss together. How Tensor works →
Desk data: daily telemetry
Per-source daily series, CSV export and the Vugol Vector breakdown · paid plans
Sources
- Roster, official filings; fundraising from FEC datapoints where on file (https://api.open.fec.gov/).
- Vugol Attention inputs, Wikipedia pageviews (https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/) and GDELT news volume and tone (https://www.gdeltproject.org/).
- Polls and results, individual polls and primary results listed on the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), each poll linked to the pollster's release; money and election dates from the FEC (public domain). How rows are checked.
- Models attention-1.0.0 · vector-1.1.0 · attention inputs SHA-256 13e75f44dc10 · methodology · license CC BY 4.0 (data license).
Vugol Vector band: R · Tilting. Have a say in the Vugol race poll; it is open to signed-in voters and never feeds these numbers.
The four Vugol signals, side by side
They answer different questions and are kept apart. Full method: Methodology.
- Vugol Vector
- Our call for every race if today’s polls hold. A snapshot, not a win probability or a vote share.
- Vugol Tensor
- How sure we are: ranges and chamber-control odds around the Vector, built from past polling error. An experiment about uncertainty, not a better guess.
- Vugol Attention
- How much news and online noise a race gets, 0 to 100. It measures noise, not support: a high score says nothing about who is ahead.
- Vugol Pulse
- Our daily thumbs-up or thumbs-down question for readers. Anyone can answer, so it describes our readers, not the public. It is not a vote and never enters a poll average or any other signal.