Home / Races / Wisconsin / Governor
WI2026

Governor · Wisconsin · 2026

General election · 2 on the November ballot · Open seat (no incumbent)

VecD 36 · TiltingTenD 87%Att60

Result

Called

David Crowley (D) won this race.

  • David CrowleyDemocraticWinnerno count in the source

Also on the ballot, no count in the source: Tom Tiffany (R).

Called
Called by Wikipedia editors, Nov 4, 1:35 AM ET (revision)
Last updated
Nov 4, 10:47 AM ET

Called it: hit Our locked call before polls closed was D; the winner is D. See every locked call

Unofficial until the state certifies the result.

Before the election

Polls, ratings and the Vugol Tensor below were published before votes were counted. They are not results.

Race poll averageGovernor · Wisconsin
David Crowley
D
53%
Tom Tiffany
R
47%
Verified poll average · 4 polls · newest poll ended 2026-10-22

Verified polls Crowley leads Tiffany by 5.8 points in our average of verified polls.

4 verified polls averaged, newest ended 2026-10-22. Page updated 2026-11-15. Sources · What is validated

ExperimentalNews attention 60/100, how much coverage the race gets, not who is winning. Updated 8 days ago. How it works

On the Wisconsin ballot, Nov 3, 2026 Election Day has passed; see the ballot as it was.Voting in Wisconsin? Check your registration, get a mail ballot, find your polling place.

On the November ballot (2)

From reported primary results, checked 2026-11-14. Each state certifies its own ballot; see the source below.

Other filers (2)

Registered with the FEC or listed in public records, but not on the November ballot as far as the results show.

Ballot source: https://elections.wi.gov/sites/default/files/documents/August%202026%20Partisan%20Primary_Summary%20Results.pdf

Polling average · 4 verified pollsVerified
Crowley +5.8

Latest verified field polling

Verified = published by the pollster that conducted it, with a public source we link to.

4 verified polls

Cite / verify

Cite thishttps://vugol.me/races/US-WI-GOV
Sourcehttps://law.marquette.edu/poll/2026/10/28/mlsp92-press-release/
Retrieved2026-11-15

Polling average Updates as polls arrive

4 verified inputs
52.9% David Crowley47.1% Tom Tiffany
25436090d60d30dtodayTIPP Insights (quarantined) · 2026-08-18 · David Crowley (D) 47.0%Marquette University (verified) · 2026-08-20 · David Crowley (D) 49.0%Marquette University (verified) · 2026-09-23 · David Crowley (D) 49.0%Z to A Research (quarantined) · 2026-10-01 · David Crowley (D) 49.0%YouGov (verified) · 2026-10-09 · David Crowley (D) 46.0%Marquette University (verified) · 2026-10-22 · David Crowley (D) 51.0%Wick (quarantined) · 2026-10-23 · David Crowley (D) 48.0%Research Co. (quarantined) · 2026-11-01 · David Crowley (D) 50.0%TIPP Insights (quarantined) · 2026-08-18 · Tom Tiffany (R) 43.0%Marquette University (verified) · 2026-08-20 · Tom Tiffany (R) 44.0%Marquette University (verified) · 2026-09-23 · Tom Tiffany (R) 46.0%Z to A Research (quarantined) · 2026-10-01 · Tom Tiffany (R) 44.0%YouGov (verified) · 2026-10-09 · Tom Tiffany (R) 42.0%Marquette University (verified) · 2026-10-22 · Tom Tiffany (R) 44.0%Wick (quarantined) · 2026-10-23 · Tom Tiffany (R) 45.0%Research Co. (quarantined) · 2026-11-01 · Tom Tiffany (R) 45.0%Live polling average · David Crowley (D) 52.9%Live polling average · Tom Tiffany (R) 47.1%
David Crowley (D)Tom Tiffany (R)● verified poll · ○ quarantined poll · ◎ live average

Vugol Tensor

How far this poll average can miss · a range, not a prediction

tensor-1.0.0

Centre D+5.8. Four times in five the result lands between D+12.5 and R+0.9; nine in ten between D+14.4 and R+2.8. Chance the Democrat finishes ahead: 87%.

Same inputs as the Vugol Tensor page: the verified polling average above (4 verified polls), plus how far polls have missed since 1998. In the backtest the plain poll average picked the wrong winner in about 11% of polled, mostly competitive races (11.2%, 946 races, 1998 to 2024), and polls miss together. Not a forecast guarantee. How Tensor works →

Results

Vote counts as reported by the state; transcribed from the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), which cites the state’s official results.

Democratic primary · official results

David Crowley won315,41339.8%
Francesca Hong311,74039.4%
Kelda Roys59,3947.5%
Joel Brennan37,0844.7%
Sara Rodriguez (withdrawn)32,6744.1%
Mandela Barnes (withdrawn)32,4354.1%
Missy Hughes (withdrawn)3,2300.4%
Brett Hulsey (write-in; withdrawn)130.0%
Tim Reppen (write-in)100.0%

Republican primary

Tom Tiffany won468,01995.3%
Andy Manske22,5734.6%
Dennis Williams (write-in)170.0%

Source: Wikipedia article revision (CC BY-SA 4.0), retrieved 2026-11-14 · parser wiki-race-1.0.0

Key dates

Official federal election dates for this state from the FEC. Registration deadlines and early voting: see the state election office.

  • 2026-08-11, Primary election: U.S. House
  • 2026-11-03, General election: U.S. House

Source: FEC election dates (public domain).

Primary and hypothetical polls (32)

Kept on file, never averaged into this race. Polls listed on the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), each linked to that article revision and, where we know it, to the pollster's own site.

  • Democratic primary · Public Policy Polling (partisan) · 2026-08-04–2026-08-05 · n=753 · Francesca Hong 42%,David Crowley (D) 24% · release
  • Democratic primary · Marquette University · 2026-07-22–2026-07-27 · n=407 · Francesca Hong 38%,Mandela Barnes 16%,David Crowley (D) 7%,Kelda Roys 2%,Joel Brennan 2% · pollster's site · release
  • Democratic primary · State Navigate · 2026-07-23–2026-07-26 · n=1,085 · Francesca Hong 42%,Mandela Barnes 13%,David Crowley (D) 12%,Joel Brennan 4%,Kelda Roys 4%,Sara Rodriguez 3%,Missy Hughes 1% · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · RMG Research · 2026-07-20–2026-07-24 · n=800 · Francesca Hong (D) 44%,Tom Tiffany (R) 43% · pollster's site · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · RMG Research · 2026-07-20–2026-07-24 · n=800 · Mandela Barnes (D) 47%,Tom Tiffany (R) 42% · pollster's site · release
  • Democratic primary · Public Policy Polling (partisan) · 2026-07-20–2026-07-22 · n=708 · Francesca Hong 35%,Mandela Barnes 15%,David Crowley (D) 14%,Kelda Roys 5%,Joel Brennan 3% · release
  • Democratic primary · Impact Research (partisan) · 2026-07-18–2026-07-20 · n=621 · Francesca Hong 39%,Mandela Barnes 26%,David Crowley (D) 11%,Kelda Roys 7%,Joel Brennan 6% · release
  • Democratic primary · Wedgewood Polls · 2026-07-18–2026-07-20 · n=505 · Francesca Hong 38%,Mandela Barnes 30%,David Crowley (D) 9% · release
  • Democratic primary · Marquette University · 2026-07-08–2026-07-16 · n=430 · Francesca Hong 26%,Mandela Barnes 15%,Sara Rodriguez 11%,Joel Brennan 2%,Kelda Roys 1% · pollster's site · release
  • Republican primary · Marquette University · 2026-07-08–2026-07-16 · n=399 · Tom Tiffany (R) 67%,Andy Manske 2% · pollster's site · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Marquette University · 2026-07-08–2026-07-16 · n=838 · Sara Rodriguez (D) 42%,Tom Tiffany (R) 41% · pollster's site · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Marquette University · 2026-07-08–2026-07-16 · n=695 · Tom Tiffany (R) 44%,Francesca Hong (D) 44% · pollster's site · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Marquette University · 2026-07-08–2026-07-16 · n=695 · Tom Tiffany (R) 44%,Joel Brennan (D) 43% · pollster's site · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Marquette University · 2026-07-08–2026-07-16 · n=695 · Tom Tiffany (R) 44%,Kelda Roys (D) 42% · pollster's site · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Marquette University · 2026-07-08–2026-07-16 · n=695 · Mandela Barnes (D) 47%,Tom Tiffany (R) 42% · pollster's site · release
  • Democratic primary · Wedgewood Polls · 2026-07-02–2026-07-04 · n=413 · Francesca Hong 30%,Mandela Barnes 28%,Sara Rodriguez 19% · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Wedgewood Polls · 2026-07-02–2026-07-04 · n=707 · Mandela Barnes (D) 48%,Tom Tiffany (R) 44% · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Wedgewood Polls · 2026-07-02–2026-07-04 · n=707 · Francesca Hong (D) 47%,Tom Tiffany (R) 44% · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Wedgewood Polls · 2026-07-02–2026-07-04 · n=707 · Sara Rodriguez (D) 47%,Tom Tiffany (R) 42% · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · TIPP Insights (partisan) · 2026-03-13–2026-03-19 · n=1,175 · Sara Rodriguez (D) 44%,Tom Tiffany (R) 41% · pollster's site · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · TIPP Insights (partisan) · 2026-03-13–2026-03-19 · n=1,175 · Mandela Barnes (D) 43%,Tom Tiffany (R) 41% · pollster's site · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · TIPP Insights (partisan) · 2026-03-13–2026-03-19 · n=1,175 · Tom Tiffany (R) 43%,Francesca Hong (D) 40% · pollster's site · release
  • Democratic primary · Marquette University · 2026-03-11–2026-03-18 · n=393 · Francesca Hong 14%,Mandela Barnes 11%,Sara Rodriguez 3%,David Crowley (D) 3%,Kelda Roys 1%,Missy Hughes 1% · pollster's site · release
  • Republican primary · Marquette University · 2026-03-11–2026-03-18 · n=396 · Tom Tiffany (R) 40%,Andy Manske 6% · pollster's site · release
  • Republican primary · Marquette University · 2026-02-11–2026-02-19 · n=371 · Tom Tiffany (R) 35%,Andy Manske 2% · pollster's site · release
  • Democratic primary · Marquette University · 2026-02-11–2026-02-19 · n=394 · Francesca Hong 11%,Mandela Barnes 10%,Sara Rodriguez 6%,David Crowley (D) 3%,Missy Hughes 2%,Joel Brennan 2%,Kelda Roys 1% · pollster's site · release
  • Democratic primary · TIPP Insights (partisan) · 2025-11-17–2025-11-21 · n=589 · Mandela Barnes 21%,Josh Kaul 8%,David Crowley (D) 6%,Sara Rodriguez 6%,Sarah Godlewski (D) 3% · pollster's site · release
  • Republican primary · TIPP Insights (partisan) · 2025-11-17–2025-11-21 · n=586 · Eric Hovde 25%,Tom Tiffany (R) 17%,Tim Michels 12%,Josh Schoemann 5% · pollster's site · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Impact Research (partisan) · 2025-10-02–2025-10-08 · n=500 · Mandela Barnes (D) 51%,Tim Michels (R) 44% · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Impact Research (partisan) · 2025-10-02–2025-10-08 · n=500 · Mandela Barnes (D) 50%,Tom Tiffany (R) 44% · release
  • Hypothetical matchup · Platform Communications · 2025-09-28–2025-09-30 · n=500 · Generic Republican 43%,Generic Democrat 40% · release
  • Republican primary · Fabrizio, Lee & Associates (partisan) · 2025-07-28–2025-07-31 · n=600 · Tom Tiffany (R) 40%,Josh Schoemann 13%,Bill Berrien 10% · release

In the news

Headlines from outlets across the political spectrum, linked to the publisher. Vugol.me doesn’t write or endorse them. How we choose them · All election news

Lab

Vugol Vector & Vugol Attention

Vugol Attention 60 Vugol Vector D · Tilting

Vugol Me model signals, not polls. Verified polling is in the Polls section above.

Vugol Me Attention (attention intensity)

Vugol Attention intensity index 0–100 · not a poll · normalized nightly

attention-1.0.0
60OUT OF 100Moderate attention
Vugol Attention percentile99th
7-day momentum3 / 100
Source breadth50% of tracked

Vugol Vector

Proprietary ensemble model · a call, not a probability · model confidence: high

vector-1.1.0
Democratic leanOpen centerRepublican lean
AnchoredHeldTiltingOpenTiltingHeldAnchored
Completeness4 of 7 inputs (national, prior, pres, pulse) · missing: incumbent, money, poll
Evidenceno audit release · fundamentals only
Freshnessoldest input 2026-11-07 (8 days ago)

The breakdown of this call (the model's multi-signal input matrix, input by input) is on Ultra Pro plans.

Desk data: daily telemetry

Per-source daily series, CSV export and the Vugol Vector breakdown · paid plans

Sources

Vugol Vector band: D · Tilting. Have a say in the Vugol race poll; it is open to signed-in voters and never feeds these numbers.

The four Vugol signals, side by side

They answer different questions and are kept apart. Full method: Methodology.

Vugol Vector
Our call for every race if today’s polls hold. A snapshot, not a win probability or a vote share.
Vugol Tensor
How sure we are: ranges and chamber-control odds around the Vector, built from past polling error. An experiment about uncertainty, not a better guess.
Vugol Attention
How much news and online noise a race gets, 0 to 100. It measures noise, not support: a high score says nothing about who is ahead.
Vugol Pulse
Our daily thumbs-up or thumbs-down question for readers. Anyone can answer, so it describes our readers, not the public. It is not a vote and never enters a poll average or any other signal.