- James Talarico Democratic: 50%
- Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. Republican: 48%
- Theodore E. Brown Jr. Libertarian: 2%
U.S. Senate · Texas · 2026
General election · 3 on the certified November ballot · Incumbent running
Result
CalledJames Talarico (D) won this race with 55.9% of the vote, 13.7 points ahead.
- James TalaricoDemocraticWinner55.9%5,622,041 votes
- Ken PaxtonRepublican42.2%4,249,373 votes
- Ted BrownLibertarian1.9%190,237 votes
- Margin
- 1,372,668 votes (13.7 points)
- Reporting
- 100% of the count in
- Called
- Called by Wikipedia editors, Nov 3, 10:55 PM ET (revision)
- Last updated
- Nov 14, 6:07 AM ET
- Source
- State results feed
Called it: hit Our locked call before polls closed was D; the winner is D. See every locked call
Unofficial until the state certifies the result.
Before the election
Polls, ratings and the Vugol Tensor below were published before votes were counted. They are not results.
Verified polls Talarico leads Paxton by 3.8 points in our average of verified polls.
16 verified polls averaged, newest ended 2026-11-01. Page updated 2026-11-14. Sources · What is validated
ExperimentalNews attention 1/100, how much coverage the race gets, not who is winning. Updated yesterday. How it works
On the November ballot (3)
Certified by the state on 2026-08-28, checked 2026-11-13.
Not on the certified ballot (13)
Filed or ran for this seat, but not on the state’s certified list for November.
Official source: https://www.sos.texas.gov/elections/forms/2026-ballot-cert.pdf
- James Talarico Democratic: 50.6%
- Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. Republican: Incumbent46.7%
- Theodore E. Brown Jr. Libertarian: 2.7%
Latest verified field polling
Verified = published by the pollster that conducted it, with a public source we link to.
Cite / verify
Polling average Updates as polls arrive
Vugol Tensor
How far this poll average can miss · a range, not a prediction
Centre D+3.8. Four times in five the result lands between D+10.5 and R+2.9; nine in ten between D+12.4 and R+4.8. Chance the Democrat finishes ahead: 77%.
Same inputs as the Vugol Tensor page: the verified polling average above (16 verified polls), plus how far polls have missed since 1998. In the backtest the plain poll average picked the wrong winner in about 11% of polled, mostly competitive races (11.2%, 946 races, 1998 to 2024), and polls miss together. Not a forecast guarantee. How Tensor works →
Campaign money (FEC)
Candidate committee totals for the cycle from the Federal Election Commission (public domain), as of each committee's latest report.
| Candidate | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand | Through |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Crockett | $11,096,966 | $11,096,966 | $0 | 2026-08-13 |
| Ken Paxton | $22,327,474 | $17,543,066 | $4,784,408 | 2026-10-14 |
| Wesley Hunt | $2,154,468 | $4,637,233 | $4,411 | 2026-09-30 |
| Anna Bender | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2026-03-31 |
| Barrett Anthony McNabb | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2026-11-14 |
| Bradford Winston Hall | $5,430 | $5,352 | $78 | 2026-10-14 |
| Colin Allred | $7,630,709 | $7,774,441 | $402 | 2026-09-30 |
| Daniel M Sims | $11,666 | $11,566 | $200 | 2026-05-19 |
| Gulrez Khan | $10,793 | $11,439 | $-646 | 2026-09-30 |
| Jade Simmons | $27,728 | $26,292 | $1,436 | 2026-10-14 |
| James Talarico | $146,349,912 | $136,427,055 | $9,922,857 | 2026-10-14 |
| Michael Swanson | $6,991 | $6,991 | $0 | 2025-09-30 |
| Sara Larue Canady | $770 | $7,491 | $-430 | 2026-03-31 |
| Terry Virts | $0 | $0 | $0 | 2026-11-14 |
| Theodore E. Brown Jr. | $14,257 | $13,037 | $1,288 | 2026-10-14 |
| Virgil Bierschwale | $9,988 | $9,657 | $383 | 2026-03-16 |
Ad spending (FEC)
What each campaign reported paying for ads, and what outside groups (super PACs, PACs and parties) reported spending for and against each candidate. Federal Election Commission filings, public domain.
| Candidate | Campaign's own ads | Outside groups for | Outside groups against |
|---|---|---|---|
| James Talarico | $16.1M | $39.5M | $221.1M |
| Ken Paxton | $3.4M | $95.8M | $100.6M |
| Wesley Hunt | $2.8M | $934K | $13M |
| Jasmine Crockett | $7.4M | $749K | $4.5M |
| Colin Allred | $981K | $19K | |
| Theodore E. Brown Jr. | $2,500 | $26K |
Biggest outside spenders
- James Talarico. For: Lone Star Rising PAC $8.5M, Texas Forever $8M, Lower Costs Now $6.7M. Against: TEXAS PAC $112.2M, America PAC $41.4M, MAGA INC. $30.1M
- Ken Paxton. For: TEXAS PAC $69.7M, MAGA INC. $7.5M, America PAC $5.9M. Against: Lone Star Rising PAC $31.2M, TEXANS FOR A CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY $25M, Texas Forever $19.4M
- Wesley Hunt. For: FIGHTING FOR TEXAS $930K, Republican Voter of Texas-PAC $4,027. Against: TEXANS FOR A CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY $5.1M, CONSERVATIVE TEXANS PAC $4.8M, LONE STAR LIBERTY PAC $3.1M
- Jasmine Crockett. For: FORWARD TEXAS $500K, Texas Organizing Project PAC $199K, Rolling Sea Action Fund $50K. Against: Lone Star Rising PAC $4.5M
- Colin Allred. For: PLANNED PARENTHOOD TEXAS VOTES VICTORY FUND $19K
- Theodore E. Brown Jr.. For: PRINCIPLED PATRIOTS PAC $25K, StarkFreedom PAC $1,269
Outside groups: 24- and 48-hour independent expenditure reports for the 2026 primary and general, through 2026-11-05, each expenditure counted once after amendments; "ads" is TV, radio, digital and other media, and the rest is mail, phones, canvassing and similar. Campaign's own ads: TV, radio, digital, other media and ad production in the campaign committee's itemized payments, as the campaign described them, from the reports the FEC has processed (latest through 2026-09-30); newer reports appear as the FEC processes them. These are amounts committees reported paying, not airtime tracked by ad-monitoring firms, so very recent buys and future reservations may not show yet. Parser fec-ad-spend-1.0.0.
Results
Vote counts from the state’s own results feed, read every minute while votes are counted. Counts change until the state certifies.
general election · state results feed, unofficial
| James Talarico won | 5,622,041 | 55.9% |
| James Talarico won | 5,447,080 | 55.1% |
| Ken Paxton | 4,250,704 | 43.0% |
| Ken Paxton | 4,249,373 | 42.2% |
| Ted Brown | 190,293 | 1.9% |
| Ted Brown | 190,237 | 1.9% |
James Talarico leads by 1,372,668 votes. 100% of reporting units counted.
Republican primary runoff
| Ken Paxton won | 888,196 | 63.8% |
| John Cornyn (incumbent) | 503,438 | 36.2% |
Democratic primary
| James Talarico won | 1,216,412 | 52.4% |
| Jasmine Crockett | 1,071,900 | 46.2% |
| Ahmad Hassan | 30,875 | 1.3% |
Republican primary · official results
| John Cornyn (incumbent) advanced | 910,382 | 42.0% |
| Ken Paxton advanced | 878,564 | 40.5% |
| Wesley Hunt | 293,250 | 13.5% |
| Sara Canady | 26,355 | 1.2% |
| Anna Bender | 24,167 | 1.1% |
| Gulrez Khan | 15,873 | 0.7% |
| John Adefope | 9,284 | 0.4% |
| Virgil Bierschwale | 9,035 | 0.4% |
Source: the state's official results feed, retrieved 2026-11-04 · parser state-feed-1.0.0
Key dates
Official federal election dates for this state from the FEC. Registration deadlines and early voting: see the state election office.
- 2026-03-03, Primary election: U.S. Senate
- 2026-04-11, Convention: U.S. Senate, LIB
- 2026-05-26, Runoff: U.S. Senate
- 2026-11-03, General election: U.S. Senate
Source: FEC election dates (public domain).
Primary and hypothetical polls (40)
Kept on file, never averaged into this race. Polls listed on the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), each linked to that article revision and, where we know it, to the pollster's own site.
- Hypothetical matchup · Overton Insights (partisan) · 2026-08-24–2026-08-26 · n=1,167 · James Talarico (D) 44%,John Cornyn (R) 43% · release
- Hypothetical matchup · Overton Insights (partisan) · 2026-08-24–2026-08-26 · n=1,167 · Ken Paxton (R) 49%,Jasmine Crockett (D) 43% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Quantus Insights (partisan) · 2026-05-21–2026-05-23 · n=1,018 · Ken Paxton 53%,John Cornyn (R) 43% · pollster's site · release
- Republican primary runoff · SoCal Strategies (partisan) · 2026-05-20–2026-05-21 · n=700 · Ken Paxton 57%,John Cornyn (R) 35% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Global Strategy Group (partisan) · 2026-05-06–2026-05-11 · n=600 · Ken Paxton 52%,John Cornyn (R) 40% · release
- Hypothetical matchup · Texas Southern University · 2026-04-22–2026-05-06 · n=1,223 · John Cornyn (R) 45%,James Talarico (D) 44% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Remington Research Group (partisan) · 2026-05-03–2026-05-05 · n=1,810 · Ken Paxton 47%,John Cornyn (R) 36% · release
- Republican primary runoff · University of Houston · 2026-04-28–2026-05-01 · n=1,200 · Ken Paxton 48%,John Cornyn (R) 45% · release
- Hypothetical matchup · Texas Public Opinion Research (partisan) · 2026-04-17–2026-04-20 · n=1,018 · James Talarico (D) 44%,John Cornyn (R) 41% · release
- Hypothetical matchup · University of Texas/Texas Politics Project · 2026-04-10–2026-04-20 · n=1,200 · James Talarico (D) 40%,John Cornyn (R) 33% · release
- Republican primary runoff · co/efficient (partisan) · 2026-04-11–2026-04-14 · n=1,143 · John Cornyn (R) 44%,Ken Paxton 43% · pollster's site · release
- Republican primary runoff · Peak Insights (partisan) · 2026-04-06–2026-04-09 · n=800 · John Cornyn (R) 44%,Ken Paxton 43% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Texas Public Opinion Research · 2026-04-06–2026-04-07 · n=1,225 · Ken Paxton 48%,John Cornyn (R) 40% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Quantus Insights (partisan) · 2026-03-21–2026-03-23 · n=1,218 · Ken Paxton 49%,John Cornyn (R) 41% · pollster's site · release
- Republican primary runoff · GQR (partisan) · 2026-03-19–2026-03-23 · n=600 · Ken Paxton 47%,John Cornyn (R) 42% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Change Research (partisan) · 2026-03-17–2026-03-19 · n=807 · Ken Paxton 42%,John Cornyn (R) 39% · pollster's site · release
- Hypothetical matchup · Impact Research (partisan) · 2026-03-12–2026-03-17 · n=900 · James Talarico (D) 43%,John Cornyn (R) 41% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Slingshot Strategies (partisan) · 2026-03-07–2026-03-08 · n=781 · Ken Paxton 49%,John Cornyn (R) 41% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Harper Polling (partisan) · 2026-03-06–2026-03-08 · n=500 · Ken Paxton 43%,John Cornyn (R) 39% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Public Policy Polling (partisan) · 2026-03-05–2026-03-06 · n=565 · Ken Paxton 45%,John Cornyn (R) 42% · release
- Hypothetical matchup · Public Policy Polling (partisan) · 2026-03-04–2026-03-05 · n=576 · James Talarico (D) 44%,John Cornyn (R) 43% · release
- Republican primary · YouGov · 2026-02-26–2026-03-02 · n=1,659 · Ken Paxton 36%,John Cornyn (R) 32%,Wesley Hunt (R) 17% · pollster's site · release
- Democratic primary · YouGov · 2026-02-26–2026-03-02 · n=2,408 · James Talarico (D) 53%,Jasmine Crockett (D) 40% · pollster's site · release
- Democratic primary · Emerson College · 2026-02-26–2026-02-27 · n=850 · James Talarico (D) 52%,Jasmine Crockett (D) 47% · pollster's site · release
- Republican primary · Emerson College · 2026-02-26–2026-02-27 · n=547 · Ken Paxton 40%,John Cornyn (R) 36%,Wesley Hunt (R) 17% · pollster's site · release
- Republican primary · Quantus Insights (partisan) · 2026-02-25–2026-02-26 · n=939 · Ken Paxton 43%,John Cornyn (R) 38%,Wesley Hunt (R) 16% · pollster's site · release
- Republican primary · Victory Phones (partisan) · 2026-02-24–2026-02-25 · n=600 · Ken Paxton 39%,John Cornyn (R) 30%,Wesley Hunt (R) 15% · release
- Democratic primary · Public Policy Polling (partisan) · 2026-02-25–2026-02-25 · n=599 · James Talarico (D) 48%,Jasmine Crockett (D) 42% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Blueprint Polling (partisan) · 2026-02-23–2026-02-24 · n=529 · Ken Paxton 49%,John Cornyn (R) 36% · release
- Democratic primary · Blueprint Polling (partisan) · 2026-02-23–2026-02-24 · n=472 · James Talarico (D) 52%,Jasmine Crockett (D) 40% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Blueprint Polling (partisan) · 2026-02-23–2026-02-24 · n=529 · John Cornyn (R) 42%,Wesley Hunt (R) 37% · release
- Republican primary · Blueprint Polling (partisan) · 2026-02-23–2026-02-24 · n=529 · Ken Paxton 42%,John Cornyn (R) 30%,Wesley Hunt (R) 14% · release
- Republican primary runoff · Blueprint Polling (partisan) · 2026-02-23–2026-02-24 · n=529 · Ken Paxton 53%,Wesley Hunt (R) 29% · release
- Democratic primary · UT Tyler · 2026-02-13–2026-02-22 · n=488 · Jasmine Crockett (D) 55%,James Talarico (D) 37% · release
- Democratic primary · University of Texas/ Texas Politics Project · 2026-02-02–2026-02-16 · n=369 · Jasmine Crockett (D) 56%,James Talarico (D) 44% · release
- Republican primary · University of Texas/Texas Politics Project · 2026-02-02–2026-02-16 · n=350 · Ken Paxton 36%,John Cornyn (R) 34%,Wesley Hunt (R) 26% · release
- Republican primary runoff · McLaughlin & Associates (partisan) · 2026-02-09–2026-02-12 · n=800 · Ken Paxton 44%,Wesley Hunt (R) 42% · pollster's site · release
- Republican primary runoff · McLaughlin & Associates (partisan) · 2026-02-09–2026-02-12 · n=800 · Ken Paxton 50%,John Cornyn (R) 38% · pollster's site · release
- Hypothetical matchup · Hart Research (partisan) · 2026-02-06–2026-02-12 · n=803 · Jasmine Crockett (D) 49%,Ken Paxton (R) 45% · pollster's site · release
- Republican primary · McLaughlin & Associates (partisan) · 2026-02-09–2026-02-12 · n=800 · Ken Paxton 36%,John Cornyn (R) 29%,Wesley Hunt (R) 26% · pollster's site · release
In the news
- Democrats strategize on how to deliver on midterm mandate
- The mistake newly-elected Dems admit they can't afford to make with Trump after sweeping 2026 wins
- Democrat heavyweights assemble for 'What's Next' conference
- Newly elected Senate Democrats in the spotlight: From the Politics Desk
- Ken Paxton has finalized his divorce, lawyer says, ending long marriage
- Scott Colom elected Mississippi’s first Black senator since Reconstruction
- Democrats flock to Denver for a post-midterms introspection-turned-celebration
- Dan Patrick concedes Texas ‘turned purple’ after Democrats’ historic blue wave
- Are Democrats ready to be a big-tent party again? Lawmakers from red states will find out.
- Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has finalized his divorce
Headlines from outlets across the political spectrum, linked to the publisher. Vugol.me doesn’t write or endorse them. How we choose them · All election news
LabVugol Vector & Vugol Attention
Vugol Attention 1 Vugol Vector R · Open
Vugol Me model signals, not polls. Verified polling is in the Polls section above.
Vugol Me Attention (attention intensity)
Vugol Attention intensity index 0–100 · not a poll · normalized nightly
Vugol Vector
Proprietary ensemble model · a call, not a probability · model confidence: medium
The breakdown of this call (the model's multi-signal input matrix, input by input) is on Ultra Pro plans.
Desk data: daily telemetry
Per-source daily series, CSV export and the Vugol Vector breakdown · paid plans
Sources
- Roster, official filings; fundraising from FEC datapoints where on file (https://api.open.fec.gov/).
- Vugol Attention inputs, Wikipedia pageviews (https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/) and GDELT news volume and tone (https://www.gdeltproject.org/).
- Polls and results, individual polls and primary results listed on the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), each poll linked to the pollster's release; money and election dates from the FEC (public domain). How rows are checked.
- Models attention-1.0.0 · vector-1.1.0 · attention inputs SHA-256 1e4b8d7fde92 · methodology · license CC BY 4.0 (data license).
Vugol Vector band: Toss-up. Have a say in the Vugol race poll; it is open to signed-in voters and never feeds these numbers.
The four Vugol signals, side by side
They answer different questions and are kept apart. Full method: Methodology.
- Vugol Vector
- Our call for every race if today’s polls hold. A snapshot, not a win probability or a vote share.
- Vugol Tensor
- How sure we are: ranges and chamber-control odds around the Vector, built from past polling error. An experiment about uncertainty, not a better guess.
- Vugol Attention
- How much news and online noise a race gets, 0 to 100. It measures noise, not support: a high score says nothing about who is ahead.
- Vugol Pulse
- Our daily thumbs-up or thumbs-down question for readers. Anyone can answer, so it describes our readers, not the public. It is not a vote and never enters a poll average or any other signal.








