- Nancy Lacore Democratic: 40%
- Jenny Costa Honeycutt Republican: 46%
- William Oliver Reeside Jr. Libertarian: 4%
U.S. House - SC-01 · South Carolina · 2026
General election · 3 on the November ballot · Open seat (no incumbent)
Result
CalledNancy Lacore (D) won this race.
- Nancy LacoreDemocraticWinnershare not given162,103 votes
- Write-insn/a0.1%218 votes
- Jenny Costa HoneycuttRepublicanshare not given158,751 votes
- Bill Reeside Jr.Lshare not given5,351 votes
- Margin
- 161,885 votes
- Called
- Called by Wikipedia editors, Nov 5, 5:42 AM ET (revision)
- Last updated
- Nov 14, 6:05 AM ET
- Source
- Wikipedia · official results page
Called it: miss Our locked call before polls closed was R; the winner is D. See every locked call
Unofficial until the state certifies the result.
Before the election
Polls, ratings and the Vugol Tensor below were published before votes were counted. They are not results.
Verified polls Honeycutt leads Lacore by 6.7 points in our average of verified polls.
1 verified poll averaged, newest ended 2026-10-01. Page updated 2026-11-15. Sources · What is validated
ExperimentalNews attention 8/100, how much coverage the race gets, not who is winning. Updated yesterday. How it works
On the November ballot (3)
From reported primary results, checked 2026-11-14. Each state certifies its own ballot; see the source below.
Ran in the primary (11)
Lost a primary or runoff for this seat, not on the November ballot.
Other filers (1)
Registered with the FEC or listed in public records, but not on the November ballot as far as the results show.
Ballot source: https://www.enr-scvotes.org/SC/127300/web.345435/#/summary
- Nancy Lacore Democratic: 44.4%
- Jenny Costa Honeycutt Republican: 51.1%
- William Oliver Reeside Jr. Libertarian: 4.4%
Latest verified field polling
Verified = published by the pollster that conducted it, with a public source we link to.
Cite / verify
Polling average Updates as polls arrive
Vugol Tensor
How far this poll average can miss · a range, not a prediction
Centre R+6.7. Four times in five the result lands between Even and R+13.4; nine in ten between D+1.9 and R+15.3. Chance the Democrat finishes ahead: 10%.
Same inputs as the Vugol Tensor page: the verified polling average above (1 verified poll), plus how far polls have missed since 1998. In the backtest the plain poll average picked the wrong winner in about 11% of polled, mostly competitive races (11.2%, 946 races, 1998 to 2024), and polls miss together. Not a forecast guarantee. How Tensor works →
Campaign money (FEC)
Candidate committee totals for the cycle from the Federal Election Commission (public domain), as of each committee's latest report.
| Candidate | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand | Through |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Pelbath | $396,522 | $395,975 | $547 | 2026-09-30 |
| Dan Brown | $7,504 | $10,806 | $730 | 2026-09-30 |
| Francina Dantzler | $12,500 | $10,310 | $4,380 | 2026-05-20 |
| Jenny Costa Honeycutt | $1,291,996 | $983,978 | $308,018 | 2026-10-14 |
| Kj Atwood | $19,483 | $18,670 | $813 | 2026-05-20 |
| Logan Cunningham | $30,381 | $30,287 | $94 | 2026-06-30 |
| Mark Smith | $956,631 | $956,631 | $0 | 2026-09-30 |
| Matthew Fulmer | $10,464 | $10,033 | $440 | 2026-07-23 |
| Max Eliot Diaz | $6,587 | $6,587 | $-452 | 2026-06-16 |
| Mayra Rivera-Vazquez | $126,367 | $110,273 | $5,824 | 2026-06-30 |
| Nancy Lacore | $4,865,630 | $4,690,325 | $175,304 | 2026-10-14 |
| Sam McCown | $1,595,792 | $1,595,792 | $0 | 2026-09-30 |
| Tyler Dykes | $25,200 | $25,996 | $-3,209 | 2026-07-07 |
| William Mac Deford | $658,144 | $657,970 | $0 | 2026-07-31 |
| William Oliver Reeside Jr. | $115,492 | $111,832 | $3,660 | 2026-10-14 |
Ad spending (FEC)
What each campaign reported paying for ads, and what outside groups (super PACs, PACs and parties) reported spending for and against each candidate. Federal Election Commission filings, public domain.
| Candidate | Campaign's own ads | Outside groups for | Outside groups against |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jenny Costa Honeycutt | $228K | $3.2M | $3.6M |
| Nancy Lacore | $611K | $1.2M | $3.3M |
| Sam McCown | $783K | $552K | |
| Mark Smith | $508K | $22K | $285K |
| William Oliver Reeside Jr. | $0 | $171K | |
| Alex Pelbath | $82K | $73K |
Biggest outside spenders
- Jenny Costa Honeycutt. For: WFW ACTION FUND INC $1.4M, American Liberty Foundation PAC $466K, CIVIC RENEWAL FUND INC. $446K. Against: HMP $1.6M, VoteVets $999K, American Democracy Project $350K
- Nancy Lacore. For: VoteVets $466K, Ready for the Fight $407K, The Bench $246K. Against: NO GOING BACK PAC INC. $1.9M, THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER PAC $843K, WFW ACTION FUND INC $276K
- Sam McCown. For: Strong PAC $520K, STRONG CONSERVATIVE VALUES PAC $32K
- Mark Smith. For: LOWCOUNTRY PATRIOT FUND $22K. Against: CONSERVATIVES FOR AMERICAN EXCELLENCE INC. $221K, WFW ACTION FUND INC $51K, Secure Tomorrow PAC $13K
- William Oliver Reeside Jr.. For: OUR HERITAGE MATTERS $171K
- Alex Pelbath. For: PALMETTO PRIORITIES PAC $73K
Outside groups: 24- and 48-hour independent expenditure reports for the 2026 primary and general, through 2026-11-13, each expenditure counted once after amendments; "ads" is TV, radio, digital and other media, and the rest is mail, phones, canvassing and similar. Campaign's own ads: TV, radio, digital, other media and ad production in the campaign committee's itemized payments, as the campaign described them, from the reports the FEC has processed (latest through 2026-10-13); newer reports appear as the FEC processes them. These are amounts committees reported paying, not airtime tracked by ad-monitoring firms, so very recent buys and future reservations may not show yet. Parser fec-ad-spend-1.0.0.
Results
Vote counts as reported by the state; transcribed from the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), which cites the state’s official results.
general election · official results
| Nancy Lacore won | 162,103 | - |
| Jenny Costa Honeycutt | 158,751 | - |
| Bill Reeside Jr. | 5,351 | - |
| Write-ins | 218 | 0.1% |
Democratic primary runoff
| Nancy Lacore won | 12,825 | 52.1% |
| Mac Deford | 11,773 | 47.9% |
Republican primary runoff
| Jenny Costa Honeycutt won | 24,035 | 53.7% |
| Mark Smith | 20,724 | 46.3% |
Democratic primary
| Nancy Lacore advanced | 20,643 | 36.5% |
| Mac Deford advanced | 16,348 | 28.9% |
| Francina Dantzler | 5,425 | 9.6% |
| Mayra Rivera-Vazquez | 5,411 | 9.6% |
| Ben Frasier | 5,369 | 9.5% |
| Matt Fulmer | 2,266 | 4.0% |
| Max Diaz | 1,117 | 2.0% |
Republican primary
| Jenny Costa Honeycutt advanced | 14,822 | 22.1% |
| Mark Smith advanced | 12,074 | 18.0% |
| Sam McCown | 10,508 | 15.7% |
| Mark Sanford (withdrawn) | 8,107 | 12.1% |
| Alex Pelbath | 7,288 | 10.9% |
| Logan Cunningham | 4,480 | 6.7% |
| Jay Byars | 4,265 | 6.4% |
| Dan Brown | 2,924 | 4.4% |
| Cindy Wagers Riley | 1,233 | 1.8% |
| Tyler Dykes | 943 | 1.4% |
| Kendal Ludden | 466 | 0.7% |
Source: Wikipedia article revision (CC BY-SA 4.0), retrieved 2026-11-14 · parser wiki-race-1.0.0
Key dates
Official federal election dates for this state from the FEC. Registration deadlines and early voting: see the state election office.
- 2026-04-11, Convention: U.S. House, LIB
- 2026-06-09, Primary election: U.S. House
- 2026-06-23, Runoff: U.S. House
- 2026-11-03, General election: U.S. House
Source: FEC election dates (public domain).
Primary and hypothetical polls (2)
Kept on file, never averaged into this race. Polls listed on the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), each linked to that article revision and, where we know it, to the pollster's own site.
- Republican primary · Pulse Decision Science (partisan) · 2026-05-16–2026-05-19 · n=418 · Jenny Costa Honeycutt (R) 20%,Mark Smith (R) 16%,Logan Cunningham (R) 7%,Sam McCown (R) 6%,Alex Pelbath (R) 6% · release
- Hypothetical matchup · Public Policy Polling (partisan) · 2025-12-05–2025-12-06 · n=645 · Mark Smith (R) 39%,Mac Deford (D) 36% · release
In the news
- Veterans in Congress projected to decline, but Dems bringing more first-time vets by 3-to-1 margin over GOP
- Here’s the latest.
- New Dems look to boost ranks and build clout
- Transcript: Rep.-elect Nancy Lacore on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Nov. 8, 2026
- At the Races: Seeing red in Minnesota?
- Full transcript of "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Nov. 8, 2026
- At the Races: Debate demands and dodges
- These House and Senate midterm races don't have winners yet
- A rural Texas district tests Democrats’ quest to expand House map
- Full transcript of "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," Oct. 4, 2026
Headlines from outlets across the political spectrum, linked to the publisher. Vugol.me doesn’t write or endorse them. How we choose them · All election news
LabVugol Vector & Vugol Attention
Vugol Attention 8 Vugol Vector R · Open
Vugol Me model signals, not polls. Verified polling is in the Polls section above.
Vugol Me Attention (attention intensity)
Vugol Attention intensity index 0–100 · not a poll · normalized nightly
Vugol Vector
Proprietary ensemble model · a call, not a probability · model confidence: medium
The breakdown of this call (the model's multi-signal input matrix, input by input) is on Ultra Pro plans.
Desk data: daily telemetry
Per-source daily series, CSV export and the Vugol Vector breakdown · paid plans
Sources
- Roster, official filings; fundraising from FEC datapoints where on file (https://api.open.fec.gov/).
- Vugol Attention inputs, Wikipedia pageviews (https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/) and GDELT news volume and tone (https://www.gdeltproject.org/).
- Polls and results, individual polls and primary results listed on the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), each poll linked to the pollster's release; money and election dates from the FEC (public domain). How rows are checked.
- Models attention-1.0.0 · vector-1.1.0 · attention inputs SHA-256 b23c560ee60c · methodology · license CC BY 4.0 (data license).
Vugol Vector band: Toss-up. Have a say in the Vugol race poll; it is open to signed-in voters and never feeds these numbers.
The four Vugol signals, side by side
They answer different questions and are kept apart. Full method: Methodology.
- Vugol Vector
- Our call for every race if today’s polls hold. A snapshot, not a win probability or a vote share.
- Vugol Tensor
- How sure we are: ranges and chamber-control odds around the Vector, built from past polling error. An experiment about uncertainty, not a better guess.
- Vugol Attention
- How much news and online noise a race gets, 0 to 100. It measures noise, not support: a high score says nothing about who is ahead.
- Vugol Pulse
- Our daily thumbs-up or thumbs-down question for readers. Anyone can answer, so it describes our readers, not the public. It is not a vote and never enters a poll average or any other signal.





