Home / Races / New York / U.S. House - NY-17
NY2026

U.S. House - NY-17 · New York · 2026

General election · 2 on the November ballot · Incumbent running

VecD 10 · OpenTenD 52%Att0

Result

CalledFlip: other to D

Cait Conley (D) won this race, defeating incumbent Mike Lawler.

  • Cait ConleyWorking FamiliesWinnerno count in the source

Also on the ballot, no count in the source: Mike Lawler (R).

Called
Called by Wikipedia editors, Nov 4, 8:25 AM ET (revision)
Seat
Changed party: held by Mike Lawler (other)
Last updated
Nov 7, 8:53 AM ET

Called it: hit Our locked call before polls closed was D; the winner is D. See every locked call

Unofficial until the state certifies the result.

Before the election

Polls, ratings and the Vugol Tensor below were published before votes were counted. They are not results.

Race poll averageU.S. House - NY-17 · New York
Cait Conley
D
50.1%
Michael Vincent Lawler
RIncumbent
49.9%
Verified poll average · 3 polls · newest poll ended 2026-09-30

Verified polls Conley leads Lawler by 0.3 points in our average of verified polls.

3 verified polls averaged, newest ended 2026-09-30. Page updated 2026-11-14. Sources · What is validated

ExperimentalNews attention 0/100, how much coverage the race gets, not who is winning. Updated yesterday. How it works

On the New York ballot, Nov 3, 2026 Election Day has passed; see the ballot as it was.Voting in New York? Check your registration, get a mail ballot, find your polling place.

On the November ballot (2)

From reported primary results, checked 2026-11-14. Each state certifies its own ballot; see the source below.

Ran in the primary (4)

Lost a primary or runoff for this seat, not on the November ballot.

Other filers (3)

Registered with the FEC or listed in public records, but not on the November ballot as far as the results show.

Ballot source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_New_York&oldid=1385333622

Polling average · 3 verified pollsVerified
Tied

Latest verified field polling

Verified = published by the pollster that conducted it, with a public source we link to.

3 verified polls

Cite / verify

Cite thishttps://vugol.me/races/US-NY-17
Sourcehttps://nypost.com/2026/10/02/us-news/gop-rep-mike-lawler-leads-dem-cait-conley-in-battleground-ny-house-district-new-internal-poll/
Retrieved2026-11-14

Polling average Updates as polls arrive

3 verified inputs
50.1% Cait Conley49.9% Michael Vincent Lawler
25436090d60d30dtodayEmerson College (verified) · 2026-09-29 · Cait Conley (D) 48.0%McLaughlin & Associates (verified) · 2026-09-30 · Cait Conley (D) 47.0%RedBox Research (quarantined) · 2026-10-23 · Cait Conley (D) 48.0%Emerson College (verified) · 2026-09-29 · Mike Lawler (R) 46.0%McLaughlin & Associates (verified) · 2026-09-30 · Mike Lawler (R) 50.0%RedBox Research (quarantined) · 2026-10-23 · Mike Lawler (R) 46.0%Live polling average · Cait Conley (D) 50.1%Live polling average · Mike Lawler (R) 49.9%
Cait Conley (D)Mike Lawler (R)● verified poll · ○ quarantined poll · ◎ live average

Vugol Tensor

How far this poll average can miss · a range, not a prediction

tensor-1.0.0

Centre D+0.3. Four times in five the result lands between D+7.0 and R+6.4; nine in ten between D+8.9 and R+8.3. Chance the Democrat finishes ahead: 52%.

Same inputs as the Vugol Tensor page: the verified polling average above (3 verified polls), plus how far polls have missed since 1998. In the backtest the plain poll average picked the wrong winner in about 11% of polled, mostly competitive races (11.2%, 946 races, 1998 to 2024), and polls miss together. Not a forecast guarantee. How Tensor works →

Campaign money (FEC)

Candidate committee totals for the cycle from the Federal Election Commission (public domain), as of each committee's latest report.

CandidateRaisedSpentCash on handThrough
Michael Vincent Lawler Republican$10,317,627$8,527,472$1,959,5242026-10-14
Beth Davidson Democratic$2,231,647$2,198,912$32,7352026-10-14
Cait Conley Democratic$10,706,692$9,758,153$948,5402026-10-14
Effie Phillips-Staley Democratic$0$0$02026-11-14
Jessica Reinmann Democratic$655,476$655,476$02026-07-06
John Cappello Democratic$79,637$79,190$4472026-09-30
John Sullivan Democratic$485,609$483,336$2,2732026-09-30
Mike Sacks Democratic$298,002$281,081$02026-09-30
Peter Chatzky Democratic$11,707,922$11,707,132$7892026-06-30

Ad spending (FEC)

What each campaign reported paying for ads, and what outside groups (super PACs, PACs and parties) reported spending for and against each candidate. Federal Election Commission filings, public domain.

CandidateCampaign's own adsOutside groups forOutside groups against
Cait Conley Democratic$1.4M+ $315K mail · through 2026-06-30$4.3M$2.7M ads · 26 groups$5.2M$4.6M ads · 6 groups
Michael Vincent Lawler Republican$223K+ $126K mail · through 2026-06-30$4.4M$3.3M ads · 7 groups$4.9M$4.2M ads · 17 groups
Beth Davidson Democratic$574K+ $294K mail · through 2026-10-08none reportednone reported
Peter Chatzky Democratic$224K+ $110K mail · through 2026-06-03none reportednone reported
John Sullivan Democratic$50K+ $3,672 mail · through 2026-06-30none reportednone reported
Mike Sacks Democratic$5,926+ $3,363 mail · through 2026-06-03none reportednone reported

Biggest outside spenders

  • Cait Conley. For: VoteVets $1.1M, Battleground New York $1M, New Democrat Majority $523K. Against: SAFETY & AFFORDABILITY PAC INC. $2.9M, PROGRESSIVE CHAMPIONS PAC $1.5M, NO GOING BACK PAC INC. $382K
  • Michael Vincent Lawler. For: SAFETY & AFFORDABILITY PAC INC. $2.9M, Center Forward Initiative Inc (CFI) $435K, America PAC $330K. Against: HMP $2.3M, LCV Victory Fund $1.1M, EDF Action Votes $863K

Outside groups: 24- and 48-hour independent expenditure reports for the 2026 primary and general, through 2026-11-05, each expenditure counted once after amendments; "ads" is TV, radio, digital and other media, and the rest is mail, phones, canvassing and similar. Campaign's own ads: TV, radio, digital, other media and ad production in the campaign committee's itemized payments, as the campaign described them, from the reports the FEC has processed (latest through 2026-10-08); newer reports appear as the FEC processes them. These are amounts committees reported paying, not airtime tracked by ad-monitoring firms, so very recent buys and future reservations may not show yet. Parser fec-ad-spend-1.0.0.

Results

Vote counts as reported by the state; transcribed from the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), which cites the state’s official results.

Democratic primary

Cait Conley won23,26349.6%
Beth Davidson14,93831.8%
Effie Phillips-Staley7,19615.3%
John Cappello7581.6%
Michael Sacks7561.6%
Write-in370.1%

Source: Wikipedia article revision (CC BY-SA 4.0), retrieved 2026-11-14 · parser wiki-race-1.0.0

Key dates

Official federal election dates for this state from the FEC. Registration deadlines and early voting: see the state election office.

  • 2026-06-23, Primary election: U.S. House
  • 2026-11-03, General election: U.S. House

Source: FEC election dates (public domain).

Primary and hypothetical polls (5)

Kept on file, never averaged into this race. Polls listed on the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), each linked to that article revision and, where we know it, to the pollster's own site.

  • Democratic primary · Tavern Research (partisan) · 2026-06-12–2026-06-16 · n=574 · Cait Conley (D) 34%,Beth Davidson (D) 23%,Effie Phillips-Staley (D) 13% · release
  • Democratic primary · Global Strategy Group (partisan) · 2026-05-07–2026-05-12 · n=500 · Cait Conley (D) 29%,Beth Davidson (D) 22%,Effie Phillips-Staley (D) 6% · release
  • Democratic primary · Data for Progress (partisan) · 2026-04-17–2026-04-24 · n=436 · Beth Davidson (D) 26%,Cait Conley (D) 15%,Effie Phillips-Staley (D) 8% · pollster's site · release
  • Democratic primary · Impact Research (partisan) · 2026-02-24–2026-02-26 · n=400 · Beth Davidson (D) 23%,Cait Conley (D) 17%,Effie Phillips-Staley (D) 8%,Peter Chatzky (D) 8% · release
  • Democratic primary · Lake Research Partners (partisan) · 2026-01-27–2026-02-01 · n=401 · Cait Conley (D) 18%,Beth Davidson (D) 17%,Peter Chatzky (D) 12%,Effie Phillips-Staley (D) 5% · release

In the news

Headlines from outlets across the political spectrum, linked to the publisher. Vugol.me doesn’t write or endorse them. How we choose them · All election news

Lab

Vugol Vector & Vugol Attention

Vugol Attention 0 Vugol Vector D · Open

Vugol Me model signals, not polls. Verified polling is in the Polls section above.

Vugol Me Attention (attention intensity)

Vugol Attention intensity index 0–100 · not a poll · normalized nightly

attention-1.0.0
0OUT OF 100Low attention
Vugol Attention percentile0th
7-day momentum0 / 100
Source breadth0% of tracked

Vugol Vector

Proprietary ensemble model · a call, not a probability · model confidence: medium

vector-1.1.0
Democratic leanOpen centerRepublican lean
AnchoredHeldTiltingOpenTiltingHeldAnchored
Completeness4 of 7 inputs (national, prior, incumbent, money) · missing: pres, pulse, poll
Evidenceno audit release · fundamentals only
Freshnessoldest input 2026-11-13 (yesterday)

The breakdown of this call (the model's multi-signal input matrix, input by input) is on Ultra Pro plans.

Desk data: daily telemetry

Per-source daily series, CSV export and the Vugol Vector breakdown · paid plans

Sources

Vugol Vector band: Toss-up. Have a say in the Vugol race poll; it is open to signed-in voters and never feeds these numbers.

The four Vugol signals, side by side

They answer different questions and are kept apart. Full method: Methodology.

Vugol Vector
Our call for every race if today’s polls hold. A snapshot, not a win probability or a vote share.
Vugol Tensor
How sure we are: ranges and chamber-control odds around the Vector, built from past polling error. An experiment about uncertainty, not a better guess.
Vugol Attention
How much news and online noise a race gets, 0 to 100. It measures noise, not support: a high score says nothing about who is ahead.
Vugol Pulse
Our daily thumbs-up or thumbs-down question for readers. Anyone can answer, so it describes our readers, not the public. It is not a vote and never enters a poll average or any other signal.