- Denise Powell Democratic: 46%
- Brinker Harding Republican: 42%
U.S. House - NE-02 · Nebraska · 2026
General election · 3 on the certified November ballot · Open seat (no incumbent)
Result
CalledDenise Powell (D) won this race with 56.7% of the vote, 16.0 points ahead.
- Denise PowellDemocraticWinner56.7%145,402 votes
- Brinker HardingRepublican40.7%104,498 votes
- Eric ForemanL2.6%6,677 votes
- Margin
- 40,904 votes (16.0 points)
- Called
- Called by Wikipedia editors, Nov 4, 4:55 AM ET (revision)
- Last updated
- Nov 14, 9:04 AM ET
Called it: hit Our locked call before polls closed was D; the winner is D. See every locked call
Unofficial until the state certifies the result.
Before the election
Polls, ratings and the Vugol Tensor below were published before votes were counted. They are not results.
Verified polls Leans Democratic (Tilting) on the Vugol Vector model, a snapshot of today, not a probability.
1 verified poll averaged. Page updated 2026-11-14. Sources · What is validated
ExperimentalNews attention 44/100, how much coverage the race gets, not who is winning. Updated yesterday. How it works
On the November ballot (3)
Certified by the state on 2026-09-11, checked 2026-11-13.
Also on the certified ballot: Eric Michael Foreman (Libertarian)
Not on the certified ballot (6)
Filed or ran for this seat, but not on the state’s certified list for November.
Official source: https://sos.nebraska.gov/sites/default/files/doc/elections/2026/Final_Statewide_General_Candidate_Filing_List_9.11.26.pdf
Latest verified field polling
Verified = published by the pollster that conducted it, with a public source we link to.
Cite / verify
Polling average Updates as polls arrive
Campaign money (FEC)
Candidate committee totals for the cycle from the Federal Election Commission (public domain), as of each committee's latest report.
| Candidate | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand | Through |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brett Lindstrom | $375,099 | $375,099 | $0 | 2026-07-15 |
| Brinker Harding | $2,850,577 | $2,537,204 | $313,373 | 2026-10-14 |
| Crystal Rhoades | $182,791 | $182,679 | $112 | 2026-05-31 |
| Denise Powell | $5,093,104 | $4,612,631 | $480,473 | 2026-10-14 |
| James Leuschen | $393,804 | $275,466 | $118,338 | 2026-09-30 |
| John Cavanaugh | $1,368,619 | $1,356,773 | $11,846 | 2026-09-30 |
| Kishla Askins | $901,522 | $901,522 | $0 | 2026-06-30 |
| Mark Edmund Johnston | $10,147 | $10,147 | $0 | 2026-03-31 |
Ad spending (FEC)
What each campaign reported paying for ads, and what outside groups (super PACs, PACs and parties) reported spending for and against each candidate. Federal Election Commission filings, public domain.
| Candidate | Campaign's own ads | Outside groups for | Outside groups against |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denise Powell | $618K | $3.9M | $312K |
| John Cavanaugh | $762K | $301K | $2.3M |
| Brinker Harding | $61K | $368K | $1.7M |
| Kishla Askins | $331K | ||
| Brett Lindstrom | $40K | ||
| Crystal Rhoades | $23K |
Biggest outside spenders
- Denise Powell. For: FIGHT FOR NEBRASKA PAC $1.3M, CHC BOLD PAC $532K, BOLD America $419K. Against: NO GOING BACK PAC INC. $122K, PROGRESSIVE PROMISE $100K, CIVIC RENEWAL FUND INC. $69K
- John Cavanaugh. For: Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC $286K, PROGRESSIVE PROMISE $15K. Against: New Democrat Majority $735K, FIGHT FOR NEBRASKA PAC $675K, LEAD LEFT PAC $435K
- Brinker Harding. For: CIVIC RENEWAL FUND INC. $324K, NO GOING BACK PAC INC. $39K, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL VICTORY FUND $2,344. Against: HMP $1.5M, CFFE PAC $194K, Building Together $12K
Outside groups: 24- and 48-hour independent expenditure reports for the 2026 primary and general, through 2026-11-13, each expenditure counted once after amendments; "ads" is TV, radio, digital and other media, and the rest is mail, phones, canvassing and similar. Campaign's own ads: TV, radio, digital, other media and ad production in the campaign committee's itemized payments, as the campaign described them, from the reports the FEC has processed (latest through 2026-06-30); newer reports appear as the FEC processes them. These are amounts committees reported paying, not airtime tracked by ad-monitoring firms, so very recent buys and future reservations may not show yet. Parser fec-ad-spend-1.0.0.
Results
Vote counts as reported by the state; transcribed from the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), which cites the state’s official results.
general election
| Denise Powell won | 145,402 | 56.7% |
| Brinker Harding | 104,498 | 40.7% |
| Eric Foreman | 6,677 | 2.6% |
Democratic primary
| Denise Powell won | 22,516 | 38.8% |
| John Cavanaugh | 21,115 | 36.4% |
| Crystal Rhoades | 8,180 | 14.1% |
| Kishla Askins | 3,499 | 6.0% |
| Melanie Williams | 2,222 | 3.8% |
| James Leuschen (withdrawn) | 320 | 0.6% |
| Van Argyrakis | 152 | 0.3% |
Libertarian primary
| Eric Foreman won | 388 | 100.0% |
Republican primary
| Brinker Harding won | 39,689 | 100.0% |
Source: Wikipedia article revision (CC BY-SA 4.0), retrieved 2026-11-14 · parser wiki-race-1.0.0+wiki-house-summary-1.0.0
Key dates
Official federal election dates for this state from the FEC. Registration deadlines and early voting: see the state election office.
- 2026-05-12, Primary election: U.S. House
- 2026-11-03, General election: U.S. House
Source: FEC election dates (public domain).
Primary and hypothetical polls (2)
Kept on file, never averaged into this race. Polls listed on the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), each linked to that article revision and, where we know it, to the pollster's own site.
- Democratic primary · GBAO (partisan) · 2026-01-08–2026-01-12 · n=600 · John Cavanaugh (D) 43%,Crystal Rhoades (D) 15%,Denise Powell (D) 10%,Kishla Askins (D) 4% · release
- Democratic primary · GBAO (partisan) · 2025-07-21–2025-07-23 · n=400 · John Cavanaugh (D) 36%,Crystal Rhoades (D) 15%,Denise Powell (D) 9%,Kishla Askins (D) 4% · release
In the news
- All the House districts that flipped in the midterm elections
- Outgoing Republican rep suggests Trump should not be leader of GOP if he loses big in midterms
- Bill and Hillary Clinton make eleventh-hour midterm moves as party's old guard faces new reality
- 2026 midterm election races to watch
- Democrats eye Nebraska as an opportunity to take a Senate seat away from Republicans
Headlines from outlets across the political spectrum, linked to the publisher. Vugol.me doesn’t write or endorse them. How we choose them · All election news
LabVugol Vector & Vugol Attention
Vugol Attention 44 Vugol Vector D · Tilting
Vugol Me model signals, not polls. Verified polling is in the Polls section above.
Vugol Me Attention (attention intensity)
Vugol Attention intensity index 0–100 · not a poll · normalized nightly
Vugol Vector
Proprietary ensemble model · a call, not a probability · model confidence: medium
The breakdown of this call (the model's multi-signal input matrix, input by input) is on Ultra Pro plans.
Vugol Tensor
How far this call can miss · a range, not a prediction · no verified poll here, so the range is wider and untested
Centre D+6.7. Four times in five the result lands between D+16.1 and R+2.7; nine in ten between D+18.8 and R+5.4. Chance the Democrat finishes ahead: 82%.
Polls have missed by about four points in a typical race and they miss together. How Tensor works →
Desk data: daily telemetry
Per-source daily series, CSV export and the Vugol Vector breakdown · paid plans
Sources
- Roster, official filings; fundraising from FEC datapoints where on file (https://api.open.fec.gov/).
- Vugol Attention inputs, Wikipedia pageviews (https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/) and GDELT news volume and tone (https://www.gdeltproject.org/).
- Polls and results, individual polls and primary results listed on the Wikipedia election article (CC BY-SA 4.0), each poll linked to the pollster's release; money and election dates from the FEC (public domain). How rows are checked.
- Models attention-1.0.0 · vector-1.1.0 · attention inputs SHA-256 abdf6799c8f6 · methodology · license CC BY 4.0 (data license).
Vugol Vector band: D · Tilting. Have a say in the Vugol race poll; it is open to signed-in voters and never feeds these numbers.
The four Vugol signals, side by side
They answer different questions and are kept apart. Full method: Methodology.
- Vugol Vector
- Our call for every race if today’s polls hold. A snapshot, not a win probability or a vote share.
- Vugol Tensor
- How sure we are: ranges and chamber-control odds around the Vector, built from past polling error. An experiment about uncertainty, not a better guess.
- Vugol Attention
- How much news and online noise a race gets, 0 to 100. It measures noise, not support: a high score says nothing about who is ahead.
- Vugol Pulse
- Our daily thumbs-up or thumbs-down question for readers. Anyone can answer, so it describes our readers, not the public. It is not a vote and never enters a poll average or any other signal.





